CO129-535-5 N.I. Brewer- transcript of trial and evidence 1-1-1929 - 31-12-1931 — Page 120

Ex.C

118

I produce Ex.C. It is public examination of Mr. Brewer which

was filed at Supreme Court on 4.9.29.

No. X X.

sa. C.D. Melbourne

Ex.D

Ex.E

Ex.F

P.3

P.4

Sd. A.G. Grantham

P.m.

I am one of proprietors of

2. George Beresford Labrum sw.

Ye Olde Printerie. I printed Ex.D. I think Mrs. Brewer gave me

the original order for the printing. I can't remember whether I

received a typewritten or manuscript copy to print from. There

is an entry in our day book on 21.6.28 for 200 copies of Ex.D.

That would not necessarily be original order for Ex.D. I supplied

proofs. N.I.B.6 conforms generally to x.D except for certain

General arrangement of Ex.D & N.I.B.6 are same.

alterations.

I have no record of any change in method of making up balance

sheet. Had I altered N.I.B.6 to N.I.B.8 that would have been a

serious alteration. We would have charged for resetting. We

have no record of any such charge. N.I.B.6 has some alterations

in Chinese characters. I produce Ex.E. It is a proof of Ex.D.

Mr. Davidson objects to production of slip pinned on to Ex.E.

Overruled.

I produce Ex.F, a proof of Ex.D.

Ex.F contains two corrections.

copies of Ex.D were same as Ex.D with green back. I delivered

It is same as Ex.D except that

Ex.D is same as N.I.B.5. Finished

finished copies on 13.7.28. I delivered 300.

out as a rule we stamp them with a rubber stamp

with comps." As a rule we send one copy only.

When I send proofs

-

'Rough copy

Exs.E & F have

no rubber stamps on them. I have no idea how Exs.E & F came

back to us.

X X I place date 13.7.28 because date is stamped on our own copy

of Ex.D. I had no occasion to make any particular notice of date

at time. It is not possible that finished copies of Ex.D were

delivered without green backs before 13.7.28. Only proofs can

Page 120Page 121